Lars E.O. Svensson

Affiliated Professor, Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics
Twitter @leosven

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Monetary and Macroprudential Policy
    • Monetary and Macroprudential Policy
    • Riksbank Monetary Policy Decisions
  • Research
  • Comments & Debate
  • Topics
  • Teaching
  • Short bio
  • CV
  • Contact
  • Links

Ska verkligen amorteringskraven komma tillbaka trots att de saknar påvisbar samhällsnytta?

“Ekonomiska tungviktare i tvist om amorteringskrav“, intervju, Dagens Nyheter, 1 februari 2021.
“Ska verkligen amorteringskraven komma tillbaka trots att de saknar påvisbar samhällsnytta?“, inlägg, Ekonomistas, 1 februari 2020.

Share Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
This entry was posted in Blog post, Interviews, Media on February 1, 2021 by admin.

Post navigation

← Remissvar på Riksbankskommitténs betänkande En ny riksbankslag
Lars E.O. Svensson
High Quality | More Pictures

Google Search

WordPress Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ska verkligen amorteringskraven komma tillbaka trots att de saknar påvisbar samhällsnytta?
  • Remissvar på Riksbankskommitténs betänkande En ny riksbankslag
  • Assessing risks to financial and macroeconomic stability from housing prices and household debt: The Swedish case
  • Macroprudential Policy and Household Debt: What is Wrong with Swedish Macroprudential Policy?
  • Op-Ed: The Swedish FSA’s amortization requirements lack demonstrable social benefits (English translation)
  • DN Debatt: Finansinspektionens amorteringskrav saknar påvisbar samhällsnytta
  • Amorteringskraven: Felaktiga grunder, negativa effekter och minskad motståndskraft
  • Ekonomistas post: The conclusion that the amortization requirements have been introduced for mistaken reasons holds also after Statistics Sweden’s revision of the household saving rates
  • Comments on Mertens and Williams, “Tying Down the Anchor: Monetary Policy Rules and the Lower Bound on Interest Rates”
  • Almedalen 2019 – The Swedish FSA’s amortization requirements: Mistaken reasons, negative effects, and reduced resilience
  • Almedalen 2019 – Amorteringskraven: Felaktiga grunder, negativa effekter och minskad motståndskraft
  • Reply on Dagens Nyheter Debatt: The Swedish FSA draws the wrong conclusions
  • Replik på DN Debatt: Finansinspektionen drar fel slutsatser
  • Monetary Policy Strategies for the Federal Reserve
  • The FSA’s amortization requirements: Should they be abolished? Swedish Radio

Archives

  • 2021
    • February 2021
  • 2020
    • April 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • September 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • January 2017
  • 2016
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
  • 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
  • 2014
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
  • 2013
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • January 2013
  • 2012
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • January 2012
  • 2011
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
  • 2010
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
  • 2009
    • November 2009
    • September 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
  • 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • 2007
    • November 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • January 2007
  • 2006
    • November 2006
    • March 2006
    • January 2006
  • 2005
    • September 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • January 2005
  • 2004
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • September 2004
    • July 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
  • 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
  • 2002
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
  • 2001
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
  • 1993
    • November 1993
Proudly powered by WordPress