Monthly Archives: November 2024

Särskilt yttrande till utredningen om Reglering av hushållens skulder (SOU 2024:71)

Ekonomistas-inlägg 2024-11-04 (Swedish only)

I egenskap av sakkunnig till utredningen om Reglering av hushållens skulder (SOU 2024:71) har jag skrivit ett särskilt yttrande till utredningen. I yttrandet stöder jag kommitténs förslag i kapitel 9 om en tydligare rambestämmelse, regeringens medgivande, ett högre bolånetak om 90 procent samt ett enhetligt amorteringskrav om 1 procent för belåningsgrader över 50 procent.

Men jag avstyrker bestämt ett införande av ett skuldkvotstak.

Utöver kommitténs förslag tillstyrker jag ett bolånetak på 95 procent för förstagångsköpare, definierade som de som inte ägt en primär bostad i Sverige de senaste tio åren.

Läs mer på Ekonomistas.

Is Swedish Household Debt Too High? Solvency, Liquidity, and Debt-Financed Overconsumption

Is Swedish Household Debt Too High? Solvency, Liquidity, and Debt-Financed Overconsumption,” first draft July 2022, this version November 2024. Paper (latest version). CEPR Discussion Paper.

Abstract

Swedish authorities and international organizations that monitor and comment on Swedish economic policy have argued that Swedish household debt is too high and a threat to financial and macroeconomic stability (FMS). But household debt may become a threat to FMS under essentially three conditions: (1) Household debt becomes too high relative to household assets. (2) Households’ debt service becomes too high relative to incomes and payment capacity. (3) Households use home-equity withdrawals—made possible by rising house prices—to finance an unsustainable overconsumption of macroeconomic significance.

The analysis covers both the total stock of mortgages and its borrowers and the new mortgages and borrowers, not—as is common—only the new mortgages and borrowers. The total stock is much larger, its borrowers are many more, and they matter much more for FMS.

Two structural features mitigate risks from the Swedish household debt. First, on a closer look, mortgages are in fact a safe cash cow for banks and contribute to financial stability. Second, the mortgage rates are not exogenous but indirectly controlled by the Riksbank and its policy rate. The Riksbank sets the policy rate to maintain macro\-economic stability and contribute to financial stability.

Regarding condition (1), aggregate household assets are much larger and have grown much faster than the debt. Net wealth was twice the debt in 1985, five times the debt in 2024. LTV ratios among the borrowers of the mortage stock are much smaller than those among the new borrowers. A full 78% of the borrowers of the stock have home equity exceeding 30%, which is more than any housing price fall during the last 50 years. Regarding condition (2), the debt service of the borrowers of the stock is not high relative to incomes, because modest LTV ratios mean that required amortization rates are modest. Regarding condition (3), there is no indication that there is any debt-financed overconsumption (undersaving) of macro\-economic significance. The HEW recorded by the Swedish FSA is not unusually high, the saving rate is at a historical high, and the share of durable consumption in total consumption expenditures is normal.

Thus, none of the three conditions is present. Swedish household debt is neither too high nor a threat to financial or macroeconomic stability.